Thank you for the advice. If I have understood this correctly, I believe you are recommending that the car's keeper (my mother) reply providing the details for the driver (my sister) as a first step. Then wait for the driver to receive the PCN before moving forward with the case?It's her choice, but yes. As it stands, your mother is in National parking Enforcement's crosshairs - as their notice would seem to be compliant with the requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedom's Act, they can hold her liable as the keeper, if they do not know who the driver is. Naming the driver would mean the company start pursuing your sister rather than your mother.
Depending on what it says about parking (or doesn’t say) in the lease, there may be a defence.I think we still need to confirm from the OP whether the car park in question is anything to do with the person or business being visited, or whether the driver just left the car nearby.
As the PCN is compliant with PoFA, and therefore the creditor is legally entitled to hold the keeper liable if they don't know the driver's details, and as the keeper wasn't driving and has not first-hand knowledge and therefore no locus with which to approach Plans A, B or C then IMO the keeper should write back to the creditor and give them the driver's details. This would avoid trying to conduct a thread with an OP who is neither the keeper nor driver but only relaying info to and from a keeper who also wasn't driving which tends to be the recipe for problems.
Just some thoughts
Depending on what it says about parking (or doesn’t say) in the lease, there may be a defence.I think we still need to confirm from the OP whether the car park in question is anything to do with the person or business being visited, or whether the driver just left the car nearby.
Depending on what it says about parking (or doesn’t say) in the lease, there may be a defence.I think we still need to confirm from the OP whether the car park in question is anything to do with the person or business being visited, or whether the driver just left the car nearby.
QuoteIs there any grounds for appeal here?Depends on the circumstances, about which we currently know nothing.
Some questions to help us to help you:
- Can you show us photographs of the signage as well as its layout at the site? A Google Maps link would also be useful
- What was the driver doing there? Were they a legitimate visitor to the premises? If so, do you know why their vehicle was not registered?
More often than not there are grounds for appeal. However, without knowing the reasons why your mother, who I presume is the keeper of the vehicle, received the PCN.
Were you the driver? If so, why did you park at the location without a valid permit?
That NtK appears to be compliant with PoFA 2012 which means, if the PPC don’t know your identity and it isn’t provided to them by the keeper, they can pursue the keeper for the charge.
Has the keeper tried Plan A yet? A complaint to the landowner requesting them to get their agent, the PPC, to cancel he PCN?
Is there any grounds for appeal here?Depends on the circumstances, about which we currently know nothing.