Here's the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEvfPNJQCDs
Well it's not a contravention to being with, and the PCN wording is hopelessly flawed. Just send this:
Dear City of Westminster,
I challenge liability for PCN WE50529041 for the following reasons:
1) The video footage does not show any contravention, as the video does not show any stationary vehicles beyond the box markings,
2) The penalty charge notice is hopelessly flawed as the statutory periods are wrong
3) Based on the above, it would be wholly unreasonable for the council to reject this representation.
Should the council reject this representation, I will be pursuing a costs application at the tribunal.
Yours faithfully,
Don't forget to keep a screenshot of the confirmation page.
Do not rely on the post, keep checking the amount due on the council website and let us know when the amount due goes up or down.
https://ibb.co/CHRSFSh
The restriction that I am supposed to have ignored was not signed
would this be the correct selection?
Here's the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEvfPNJQCDs
Well it's not a contravention to being with, and the PCN wording is hopelessly flawed. Just send this:
Dear City of Westminster,
I challenge liability for PCN WE50529041 for the following reasons:
1) The video footage does not show any contravention, as the video does not show any stationary vehicles beyond the box markings,
2) The penalty charge notice is hopelessly flawed as the statutory periods are wrong
3) Based on the above, it would be wholly unreasonable for the council to reject this representation.
Should the council reject this representation, I will be pursuing a costs application at the tribunal.
Yours faithfully,
Don't forget to keep a screenshot of the confirmation page.
Do not rely on the post, keep checking the amount due on the council website and let us know when the amount due goes up or down.