Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Private parking tickets => Topic started by: thierry24 on August 19, 2026, 03:44:10 pm
-
Agreed, but then further on it says "if you were not the driver blah blah blah"
If it is a hirer vehicle then the hire company have either i) simply passed the notice onto the hirer directly, or ii) nominated the hirer as the person responsible for the vehicle at the material time.
That does not mean that the hirer can assume to be the driver.
The slam-dunk way out of this is through a POPLA appeal.
We definitely need to know more background info.
-
It is not a Notice to Hirer:
'..you have been named as the driver of the vehicle..'
OP, the rest of the whatever it is notice pl.
On the face of it, this has nothing to do with PoFA and is a simple matter of the operator pursuing the alleged driver and trying to shoe-horn this into their pre-printed notices!
-
Can we assume the following;
1. The Notice is in the hirers (OP's) own name and not the name of the hirer company?
2. That no other documents were served in the same envelope as the notice?
The notice shown is not PoFA complaint - the wording of a Notice to Hirer differs from that of an NtK. A NtH must also reference the original NtK.
-
More details needed.
What are the terms of your lease, especially with regards parking?
-
You have blanked out issue date and you say vehicle was hired did you have the appropriate documents forwarded to you. You need to post the front and back of PCN and any signs which are present at the site.
-
Hello guys,
Hope all is well.
I am the hirer of the vehicle in question and have received the below letter from CPM and being offered 40% discounted rate or ability to appeal this ticket as its within it's first 14 days of receipt.
https://ibb.co/VptgrP9c
Any dvice would be appreciated.
Kind regards