Free Traffic Legal Advice
Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: NTIAEP on July 12, 2026, 07:17:30 pm
-
+1
-
Contravention did not occur
As the authority will know, the contravention requires my car to be straddling bay markings, whether end-of-bay or optional transverse markings. The CEO has taken photos and I would draw your attention to the one which captures the end-of-bay markings, the whole length of the nearside of my car and the carriageway underneath. The end-of-bay markings are clear and there is nothing which even resembles the clarity of this marking under my car. I suppose it's possible that the CEO simply pressed the wrong button on their computer, I don't know.
But what is clear is that the council's evidence does not support the given contravention and therefore the PCN must be cancelled.
I suggest something along the lines of the above because IMO you should reference the clarity of the end-of-bay markings as IMO these set the standard for any transverse markings. Compare, contrast, conclude.
-
The London Borough of Redbridge doth attempt to extrapolate the urine as ever.
-
Yes, go for council's own evidence (CEO photos), which show no individual bay markings, so the contravention did not occur
-
Hello to all
Posting on behalf of a friend...honest.
Redbridge
Challenge/View a PCN (https://enforcement.redbridge.gov.uk/)
PCN: AF15697300
VRM: BN66BUP
pic of PCN (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/grtrhln9zovjbxjocotsn/20260708_BN66BUP_PCN_AF15697300_Wellesley-Rd.jpg?rlkey=9z5lq2x8m83ipnyxiaa8f7hvs&st=m73efydw&dl=0)
GSV (Mar2018) (https://maps.app.goo.gl/qxL66qyUVqRE5k3M6)
The council's photo evidence doesn't show any other bay markings......so submit "no evidence/provide strict proof" as valid reps. Thoughts?
Answers on a postcard please.