Free Traffic Legal Advice

Live cases legal advice => Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) => Topic started by: disabled78 on March 30, 2026, 04:39:06 pm

Title: Re: Contravention Code 02 with no single or double yellow lines and No yellow "blips" on the kerb
Post by: disabled78 on March 30, 2026, 08:04:20 pm
Thanks for all the useful information.

So is it worth taking it via formal representation (and what grounds) or just pay up and close it off?

Thanks
Title: Re: Contravention Code 02 with no single or double yellow lines and No yellow "blips" on the kerb
Post by: stamfordman on March 30, 2026, 06:53:45 pm
Yes it's an RPZ but there must be clear entry signs as examples below. The CEO has taken pics of a repeater sign.

(https://i.ibb.co/x81ymKrM/Screenshot-2026-03-30-at-18-51-21.png)

-------

(https://i.ibb.co/RLV097w/b4.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/FpcPKQ8/b3.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/q3kHZHGj/b2.jpg)
(https://i.ibb.co/4ZSvhC8M/b1.jpg)
Title: Re: Contravention Code 02 with no single or double yellow lines and No yellow "blips" on the kerb
Post by: tincombe on March 30, 2026, 06:48:46 pm
According to the council, you were in a Restricted Parking Zone.

In case you didn't know, these are the Devil's device because they act as a CPZ but without the markings!

Therefore, if you were only this applies:

The car was not loading or unloading rather picking up an autistic child which is generally allowed with Contravention Code 02
Title: Contravention Code 02 with no single or double yellow lines and No yellow "blips" on the kerb
Post by: disabled78 on March 30, 2026, 04:39:06 pm
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have received a PCN ticket with Contravention Code 02 with no single or double yellow lines and No yellow "blips" on the kerb.
I have made an appeal which was rejected the next working day.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of the PCN located here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1kuk0yxo4sxdzk0cqd7ik/Page1.jpg?rlkey=as94m6qyxqf4k1acijnhc23wx&st=trppwb4h&dl=0

Page 2 of the PCN located here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/eo1rg6ca37dixwz10zmjh/Page2.jpg?rlkey=ft5eiapbtxr8qmuuynirhulgy&st=enfmxroe&dl=0

Appeal rejection letter located here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7ajw7km8gw9vn6g733wef/1A361F078ECFD_page-0001.jpg?rlkey=r4xgviqag1sx1ql6day6uji54&st=l2b2n6kd&dl=0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further evidence can be seen by using the PCN No. and Vehicle reg.

Please advise:
1) Since the appeal has been rejected, based on the grounds and circumstances, do I have chances of winning if I take it to formal representation or should I take it further for formal representation?
2) What other grounds or information can I specify during formal representation?
3) What is formal process involved in formal representation. I am aware of NTO will be sent in 28 days, and then what are the steps involved thereafter?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal which was rejected follows:
Dear Sirs,

The registered keeper of this vehicle XXyyXXX, received a notice dated 16 March 2026 with Notice No.BK111111111 with Contravention Code 02 - Parked or Loading/Unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force

I contend that the alleged contravention did not occur and wish to appeal against it on the following grounds:

Following information and following exhibits are part of the appeal.