Author Topic: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane) E10  (Read 8452 times)

0 Members and 220 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane) E10
« Reply #60 on: »
Thanks.

i`ve just been on the tribunal website and i can see something where the council uploaded saying Do not contest???
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane) E10
« Reply #61 on: »
That was quick!  And I wasn't even mentioned - yet..... :D Well  done for staying the course.  ;)
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane) E10
« Reply #62 on: »
That was quick!  And I wasn't even mentioned - yet..... :D Well  done for staying the course.  ;)

thanks to all on here :)

For later:

The Waltham Forest (Bus Lanes) (No. 1) Traffic Order 2001
The Waltham Forest (Bus Lanes) (No. 1 2001) (Amendment No. 8) Traffic Order 2007
Corrigendum

I haven't checked if it's material, but I don't think the corrigendum can have any legal effect as it purports to alter the substantive effect of the order, if it does become material we have the Montague Avenue cases that dealt with that issue.
@cp8759: is your post relevant please re this thread?:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/waltham-forest-code-34-being-in-a-bus-lane/msg12936/#msg12936

Also, they have only produced the second TMO link.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2024, 06:03:48 pm by cp8759 »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"