Hi all,
A few weeks ago a created a thread at
https://forums.pepipoo.com to seek advice regarding a PCN I received from Waltham Forest for "52M Failure to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle", issued on 03/04/2024. Unfortunately their site appears to have been down for several weeks now, so I am seeking advice here instead.
The road in question was open to vehicles travelling in both directions until 09-2023. Since that time, a restriction has been put in place for vehicles (except cyclists) travelling eastbound, which begins about 30m after the entrance to the road.
It was the position of the signs that caused the confusion, as I was not expecting restrictions to begin in the middle of the road, which would cause vehicles legitimately entering the street to have to perform a difficult U-turn in the middle of the road in order to comply. There is also a "No-through road" sign posted at the actual entrance, but is angled so that vehicles turning right into Blenheim Rd from Blackhorse Lane would not see it (as happened to me).
PCN attached:




Below are some photos of the street showing the available signage:





Based on the advise I received at PPP, the following informal appeal was submitted on 15/04/2024:
Dear London Borough of Waltham Forest
Ref: PCN FR62082781
VRM: HY16WXW
I make these representations against the above PCN:
1. The signage at the entrance to Blenheim Road is insufficient and inadequate. When travelling northbound on Blackhorse Lane E17 and making a right turn into Blenheim Road, there are no visible signs warning that there is restricted entry further down Blenheim Road. The only sign at the entrance which warns of "No Through Road" (Except Cycles) is positioned at such an angle that it is not visible to drivers entering from this direction. [Please see photo below]
2. The signage in Blenheim Road where the restricted entry starts is not at the entrance to the road nor at any natural junction. The prohibition signs, CCTV signs and a blue information sign about Forest Road are positioned further than 30m from the entrance to Blenheim Road. This causes confusion for any driver who having driven to this point without contravening any regulations, and once having assimilated the information on the various signs, is faced with an unexpected U-turn type manoeuvre in an area of road constricted by parked cars. Furthermore, the "No Entry" markings on the road itself are confusing in conjunction with the signs, as they contradict the right of cyclists and those using non-motorised forms of transport to proceed.
In light of the inadequate, perplexing, and confusing signage I request that the PCN be cancelled.
Yours faithfully,
[redacted]
At the beginning of last week, I received a notice of rejection of the above appeal by post, allegedly sent on 06/05/2024 (though received only a few days ago). See attached below:







(This was despite an automated reply from wfpcn@nsl.co.uk being sent on 15/04/2024 clearly stating:
Correspondence received by email before the Notice to Owner has been issued will be responded to by email. Please ensure that you check your Junk/Spam emails to ensure you do not miss our response.
I have 3 more days to either pay at the reduced amount or appeal via the adjudicator. I am willing to go via the adjudicator route and risk the additional £65 if there are grounds for appeal with even a 50:50 chance of success, but if this case looks hopeless I guess I will cough up. Grateful for any advice I receive in this thread.
Many thanks!