0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
@Incandescent Hippocrates suggest that the time frame in which the EN was sent bares no relevance. Although the legislation doesn’t specify a limit in which an EN must be sent, you said that anything more than 3 months is considered abuse of process by LT.Do we have any example cases?I can have a look but really need to submit reps against the EN today as running out of time.
The CHief Adjudicator has made it clear to councils that delays of over 3 months to do anything in the enforcement process is grounds for cancellation, unless very good reasons are submitted.
Quote from: Incandescent on August 13, 2026, 07:04:24 pmThe CHief Adjudicator has made it clear to councils that delays of over 3 months to do anything in the enforcement process is grounds for cancellation, unless very good reasons are submitted.Where please?
I continued to dig around and things like this tend to be buried, but in the process for Bus Lane PCNs, it is stated that councils should normally respond to reps against an EN within three months. I confess that there is no stricture against service of the EN itself.https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat/understanding-enforcement-process/bus-lane-pcn-enforcement-process#enHowever, it is clear that delays in enforcement is an issue that has been around since the 90s. Would a London Tribunals adjudicator be happy if the EN was served a year later ? Surely not.
Login with your social network