3. TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?  (Read 2856 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« Reply #15 on: »
There's no photographic evidence of the signage provided by TfL. a possible "win" when it goes to Tribunal.
Logged
Bus driving since 1973. My advice, if you have a PSV licence, destroy it when you get to 65 or you'll be forever in demand.
Re: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« Reply #16 on: »
'We issued your PCN because your vehicle was ...........'

Whereas the actual PCN states...............!
Logged
Re: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« Reply #17 on: »
Quote from: H C Andersen on October 16, 2025, 08:34:52 pm
'We issued your PCN because your vehicle was ...........'

Whereas the actual PCN states...............!

Oh now I get it! (Thank you!!) I thought it was odd they mentioned this 50cm nonsense but I'd initially dismissed it, assuming it was just their way of referring to the fact I wasn't parked in the adjacent bay.

So do I appeal based on this reason alone, or should I still mention the other reasons?

(I assume the reason for appeal would now be "contravention did not occur"?)
Logged
Re: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« Reply #18 on: »
Hearing date set for February 25th.
Logged
Re: TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?
« Reply #19 on: »
When the time comes, I suggest you introduce the subject in a different manner.

Perhaps...

As the adjudicator will notice, my detailed formal reps were against the contravention of ****** and therefore I was completely nonplussed by their Notice of Rejection which states that they are rejecting my representations and upholding the contravention of ******.

Logged
Funny Funny x 1 View List
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. TFL Red Route PCN - Weak/No Evidence?