But you didn't use the bay between July and October?
OP, this is the essence of your appeal given that TfL officers acknowledge ignoring the authority's order and not implementing its provisions when it came into effect.
I can't tell you what to say, but if the facts fit....
I have used the bay since at least ***. I normally/only park here in order to donate items to **** which is an adjacent charity shop.
As can be seen in the attached GSV snapshots, in 2020,2021,2022 and July 2024(although TfL claim to have amended the sign in July 2024) the restriction was: No Stopping except 10am-4pm Loading, max. 20 minutes. I had therefore become familiar with what I was permitted to do and not do.
As the adjudicator will see from TfL's evidence, in December 2023 Transport for London amended the restriction such that 'No Stopping except loading 10am-4pm' became 'except 7pm-7am'. I can only imagine that these changes, which created unsocial hours exemptions, hardly pleased the adjacent shops.
I cannot recall how often I had used the bay prior to 2024, but I can remember using it at least *** between December 2023 and July/Aug 2024 without issue. Therefore, when I used it on 28 October I assumed that the restriction was the same.
But it wasn't. And, as can be seen, not by a marginal amount but fundamentally.
While I accept that in principle a driver should always check signs, I would ask the adjudicator to consider the event dates in this case. Specifically, Transport for London amended the restrictions which came into force on 1 December 2023 and yet for reasons which have not been detailed, officers did not implement these changes until July/August 2024. Therefore, I (and every other motorist) had been parking in technical contravention between 1 Dec. 2023 and July/Aug 2024. Had TfL implemented the changed restrictions when they were obliged to do, then the contravention on 28 October would not have occurred. And if these changes had been brought into effect when legally obliged and implemented with some changeover leeway(given that the previous restriction was in effect for so long) then it is likely that would not be facing a penalty from October 2024.
I respectfully submit that TfL officers who disregarded their duty to implement the amended order when it came into force should not be allowed to pursue me for this penalty when they decided to do so without, in my case, any prior warning.
Some thoughts!
But more info from you pl.