Register your appeal.
Grounds:
Penalty exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case.
Procedural impropriety.
Further representations may be made upon review of the authority's evidence.
For your benefit and knocking around until refined here are some thoughts.
The PCN states:
'Transport for London believes that a penalty charge is payable....for the alleged contravention of ....on 21/11/2024 at 16.10'.
The 'General' Regulations (which regulate these PCNs) state
Imposition of penalty charges for relevant road traffic contraventions
5.—(1) A penalty charge may be imposed with respect to a vehicle where that vehicle is involved in a relevant road traffic contravention which is committed on or after the commencement date.
(2) But no penalty charge may be imposed under paragraph (1) in relation to a parking contravention where—
(a)the vehicle is stationary in a designated parking place and is left beyond the permitted parking period, and
(b)the period for which it is left beyond the permitted parking period does not exceed 10 minutes.
....
"designated parking place” means a parking place established by virtue of an order made under section 1, 6, 9, 32(1)(b), 35 or 45 of the RTRA 1984;
“permitted parking period” means a period of parking—
(a)....
or
(b) for which no charge is payable as authorised by or under any order made relating to the designated parking place.
For info, the order creating the restrictions and exemptions at the location was made under section 6...RTRA. Therefore the 'grace' period applies.
The exempted period ended at 16.00.
The authority's own evidence shows that they believed they were entitled to impose a penalty at 16.10.
They were not because at that time 'the period for which it ..[had been] left beyond the permitted parking period [did] not exceed 10 minutes.
For the purposes of the regulation it is immaterial for how long a vehicle was left after a penalty had been demanded.
Parliament specified the exact period of 10 minutes and it does not lie with TfL to amend this.
Similarly, the Notice of Rejection states the following:
You may appeal to an Environment and Traffic Adjudicator at London Tribunals, an independent adjudication service, against this decision on specified grounds within 28 days of the date of service of this letter.
This is incorrect and materially misleading because the term 'within' means beginning on the day after the trigger event(in this case the deemed date of service) therefore TfL have stated that you may (taking its proper construction of 'have a legal right to') appeal on day 29 after service.
This is not your legal right and to avoid owners misunderstanding their situation the regulations impose a requirement on an authority to specify this period in a NOR. Failure to do this constitutes a procedural impropriety which is a statutory ground of appeal.
Further, they have also failed to notify you that, subject to the approval of the adjudicator and other conditions, you may request that your appeal is registered after the '28-day period'.
OP, pl post the 'enclosed form'.