« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2025, 10:29:17 pm »
Outcome.
Useful for yet another scrap tomorrow. Sorry - hotly contested appeal!
In addition, I agree with the decision of my learned colleague Mr Greenslade in the case cited by the Appellant, 2240178326
Maurice Fisher v London Borough of Hackney, in which he said that "it is not open to the Enforcement Authority to seek any sum beyond the prescribed amount or any amount at all whilst an appellant is appealing to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator."
« Last Edit: February 04, 2025, 10:33:29 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!
I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.
If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".
cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"
There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.
To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
