3. RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)  (Read 1495 times)

0 Members and 74 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)
« Reply #15 on: »
Won.  ;D Unsigned certificate and incorrect legislation cited in the WS. (And they did not attend as per usual.)
« Last Edit: July 31, 2024, 11:07:06 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)
« Reply #16 on: »
Thank you everyone for your efforts... makes you wonder how many they've claimed illegally from this camera !!
Logged
Re: RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)
« Reply #17 on: »
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)
« Reply #18 on: »
Thanks cp for posting the decision which will be very useful for the next battle.  ;)

Submissions
 
 
I make the following submissions on behalf of the appellant:
 
1. The council’s photographic evidence does not prove the alleged contravention.
2. The NOR fails to mention that the adjudicator may extend time in which to lodge an appeal and so does not satisfy para. 5(b) of Schedule I of the London Local Authorities Act 1996.
3. Whether the author of the Witness Statement attends or not, I wish to make further submissions regarding the said statement.
 
In light of the above, please allow the appeal.
 

As an allegedly garrulous Welshman, I deliberately curtail my written/underfed skeleton argument so as to be in the former mode - if allowed.  ;D Unfortunately, the Adjudicator knew this as we have met many times.

But, if another had heard it, who knows?  I am not complaining.

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/bus-lane-pcn/msg31663/#msg31663

Nathan Hall v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (2240289699, 29 July 2024).pdf
Google Docs · drive.google.com
« Last Edit: July 31, 2024, 11:04:27 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. RE: LB ofWaltham Forest: 34 Being In A Bus Lane, High Road Leyton (Bus Lane)