Free Traffic Legal Advice

reps submitted as follows:

""""""""""
Representations (not exhaustive) against PCN AF30678447:

• The exact locus of the alleged contravention is not stated in the PCN.
• The vehicle was within the confines of the single-yellow line (as permitted at the time) and I put to you strict proof that the vehicle encroached the alleged Bus Stop.
• There is no evidence of an upright sign in the video, even more so for a Bus Stop of that length.  I also take this opportunity to refer you to the penultimate sentence contained within section 13.24.9 of the ‘Traffic Signs Manual – Chapter 3 - Regulatory Signs’ which states: “……. Where the bus stop marking has been extended to accommodate two or more buses, it might be preferable to mount the sign close to the beginning of the bay. …….”
• Notwithstanding the above, I put to you strict proof that the markings for the alleged Bus Stop are in accordance with section 13.24.9 of the ‘Traffic Signs Manual – Chapter 3 - Regulatory Signs’.  From the ‘evidence’ that you have so far provided, it is obvious that the markings have been deliberately ‘blacked-out’ by the council thus making them invalid rather than due to mere wear & tear’.
• I also put you to strict proof that the camera used to capture the alleged contravention has the correct approval and also request the make/model of the camera.
• I make this collateral challenge in that the LBR parking website fetters discretion because of all the boxes with grounds which must be ticked, even before a formal representation can be made. This is surely wholly prejudicial.
• Please also be advised that should you not cancel the PCN, I put you on formal notice that I will be appealing this matter to London Tribunals and will be requesting an award for costs.
""""""""""

Appeal filed after Charge Certificate already served prematurely. Silence is golden.

Who runs this outfit?  Roy Rogers and Trigger?