3. Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)  (Read 590 times)

0 Members and 79 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« on: »
Hi All

Looks like I've become a cropper on this one, but thought I'd check in here before at least putting a representation in and then coughing up the dough.  Won't say too much as don't want to incriminate myself, except that in the rush looks like I completely missed the big yellow thing and even used the RingGo app to park.  Returned to the vehicle shortly thereafter to see a nice gift attached to the windscreen.

Thoughts or any suggestions?

PCN No: AF08832144 (.pdf is available here)
Vehicle reg: SAF17A

GSV link

https://my.redbridge.gov.uk/parkingpcn/review

Kind Regards - NTIAEP
« Last Edit: March 18, 2025, 10:50:04 pm by NTIAEP »
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #1 on: »
How you missed the suspension sign that is right next to your car is beyond me !

However, all may not yet be lost. Please post a GSV link to the exact location so we can check what the parking restrictions are there.
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #2 on: »
I was in a rush and had also just 'politely' told another motorist who'd selfishly parked right in the middle of both spaces to move his car backwards/forwards.....so my my focus was elsewhere.

GSV added in first post
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #3 on: »
Rush or no rush, the sign is bright yellow and mounted on the same pole as the sign for the bay restrictions. Frankly, I see no appeal argument against the signing of the suspension, but there may be a 'technical' appeal based on Redbridge mismanagement of the enforcement process. However, the PCN looks compliant with the regulations on its content.
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #4 on: »
Quote from: Incandescent on March 18, 2025, 11:37:03 pm
Rush or no rush, the sign is bright yellow and mounted on the same pole as the sign for the bay restrictions.
I know  ::)

Quote from: Incandescent on March 18, 2025, 11:37:03 pm
Frankly, I see no appeal argument against the signing of the suspension, but there may be a 'technical' appeal based on Redbridge mismanagement of the enforcement process. However, the PCN looks compliant with the regulations on its content.
Any colour on this 'technical' approach?
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #5 on: »
Wait for the NTO as discussed.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #6 on: »
NTO received....but without the discount!!

NTO (redacted)

(It's more than very likely that I may not have told my better half, the registered keeper, about this particular PCN.)
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #7 on: »
Having been issued the original PCN via the windscreen and a representation not submitted within the 14 days, should the penalty charge in the subsequent NTO have been re-offered at the discount or full?
Logged
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #8 on: »
They are not obliged to reoffer the discount. I would check what the website says though.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)
« Reply #9 on: »
Just as an update, I took this one on the chin and paid the full PCN at £130  >:(
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. Redbridge/21-Parked in a Suspended Bay/Outside 229 Ilford Lane (IG1)