Author Topic: Redbridge PCN: Perrymans Farm Rd 53j: Failing with a restriction on vehicles entering a pedestrian zone  (Read 862 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi All,


I have received a PCN from Redbridge council. Pretty annoyed as I'm not sure how I managed to miss the signs, but I was somewhat in a rush as I was attending a GP appointment alongside my Mum and had my two-year old in the car. I entered the road less than 10 minutes before the restriction expired as well, which is unfortunate. I have had to have a look around to find out what the signage says, as it isn't clear from the pictures on the PCN, and the new signage isn't currently on Google Maps. I've attached an image below of what the signage says.

What confuses me is the blue, 'Term-time Only' signage, which doesn't appear on Google Maps so it must be a relatively new addition. I am not quite sure how I'd know when term-time is, and different schools break up at different times. For example, this current week (W/C 17th Feb) is half term for some schools, but I know of other schools that break up earlier/later, so wouldn't this mean the 'Term time Only' wording is quite vague?

I've attached some images below of the PCN letter, as well as the PCN images from the Redbridge council website. Would this be something worth appealing?

Many thanks in advance for anyone who can offer any advice.





[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


I think you have got the "Get-out-of-Jail Free" card here in the form of that blue sign with the text about school streets and term times. This is because a sign must give the facts of a restriction on the sign; this doesn't. How does a motorist know if you can pass the sign ? When are the term start and finish days ?  There is a precedent for this sort of thing with "Event zones", where parking has special restrictions on event days.  For these, the council must put on the zone entry signs the date of the next event; putting them on-line on their website is not sufficient. 

These blue signs you see are an attempt by councils get get out of their duty to tell you if it is term time or holidays.

The good news is that these signs have already lead to appeals to London Tribunals being won.

Indeed. I won one a few months ago.  Here:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-failing-to-comply-with-a-restriction-on-vehicles-entering-a-pedestrian-zone/msg49432/#msg49432

Another pending.

Please screenshot all the pages including the hoops you have to agree by ticking the boxes. And the last page which limits to one representation. Then:

Draft:


Dear Sir or Madam

1. The council’s website limits to one ground of representation and also fetters its discretion by creating many hoops through which the appellant must pass in terms of grounds it will not accept. Please see the screenshots attached.

2. The following case supports the argument of the proscribed sign: Conor Costelloe v London Borough of Merton Case No. 2240078999. The Adjudicator said: But what in my view is rather markedly non-compliant is the legend "School term time" in a separate panel below the grey backed signage.

3. Further, the application for a review of the above case was refused:

Review decision

Reasons for refusal

While I agree with a general proposition that an advisory or advance warning sign does not have to be compliant, the issue in this case is not simply about a non-compliant advance warning sign.

It is a reasonable inference that the advance warning sign was installed because motorists intending to turn left may find it difficult to appreciate the restriction before committing to the turn. The advance warning signage must therefore give a clear warning to render the overall signage adequate.

The use of the phrase "during terms times" is not authorised for the simple reason that it requires motorists to know what the term time are so it is just about non-compliance, it is about a lack of clarity as to when the restriction operates.

If an advance warning sign is needed and it is not clear, the Adjudicator is entitled to conclude the overall signage is inadequate.

The application is refused.




In light of the above, I please cancel the PCN.

Yours faithfully
« Last Edit: February 19, 2025, 11:08:59 am by Hippocrates »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

This is excellent information, thank you Incandescent and  Hippocrates!

I have just logged my appeal on the the council's website using the template message you sent, and attached screenshots of all those pages/checkboxes that needed to be ticked, as well as the signage.

Fingers crossed they get back quickly, but I guess the most likely next step from here will be a Tribunal?

Of course they will reject.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Yep, they have rejected the appeal and sent us a physical letter to fill in should we wish to continue with the appeal. Presumably we just fill this out as normal? Or is there anything specific to note down before we send this off?

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Let's see all sides of the Letter of Rejection. Only redact yr name & address.

Sure, here are both sides of the letter of rejection. We received the letter on 24/02/2025.



[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

If you wish for representation, I am available.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

That would be phenomenal, thank you! Do I need any of your details currently to fill in the form they have sent me for the next stage of the appeal? I'm referring to section 3 'Name of Authorised Representative' specifically. Or do I just put my own details down on that for now?

I will PM you and advise. I will file the appeal for you online.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Just won the other won today. 2250006928 will be published tomorrow. Signage. Will call tonight.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Refused and review application refused too. 2250132081
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Refused and review application refused too. 2250132081
I have never seen such a load of bullshit in an adjudication before. Where did this bloke come from ? The adjudication is just the pits !

Quote
"21. Even though that was not the case in the instant scenario, I am of the view that it is the motorist’s responsibility and not unreasonable to inform themselves of local school term times. In absence of knowledge, the motorist should look at the clearly proscribed signage as an indicator and take heed."

This is just utter tosh. So a driver from Birmingham visiting relatives in London is expected to look up all the school term times before he sets off ? Give me strength, oh Lord !