Free Traffic Legal Advice

Just to update you - On the evidence pack , I just saw -

“i confirm that Appellant has been sent copies of all evidence in accordance with Adjudicator’s requirements- Date sent 15/10/2025 and signed.

But we received this yesterday .

OK so it was yesterday. This doesn't meet the tribunal direction no matter when they sent it and in any case if they sent it on 15 October with a hearing of 21 October then with postal service allowance of 2 days this busts the 5 days.

Joining call now . Good luck to me . Thanks for your guidance.

Well done. Redbridge insults you and the tribunal by leaving things to the last moment and supplying inadequate material and notice.

Try a modest costs application. They wasted your time.

Well done. Redbridge insults you and the tribunal by leaving things to the last moment and supplying inadequate material and notice.

Try a modest costs application. They wasted your time.

Yes they did , and the effort , the stress , the time , and a day off from work today to attend. Everything adds up . It’s all ok now.

They are as thick as **** aren't they.

“i confirm that Appellant has been sent copies of all evidence in accordance with Adjudicator’s requirements- Date sent 15/10/2025 and signed.

So deemed served 17 October.

Today is 21st.

Adjudicator's requirements (AKA Practice Direction) are that evidence must be served 'no later than 5 days before the first scheduled hearing..'.

21-17 = 4.

Oh well!

Ya Yes they are and I haven’t seen them
On the call. Unless they were before me .

I have mentioned to adjudicator that the evidence pack was received yesterday late afternoon and referred to recent cases @stamfordman mentioned.

Instead of considering that ,(I’m surprised why that wasn’t considered , I have given case references aswell) ?  Adjudicator asked me if I needed more time to go through the evidence pack and do I want to postpone this hearing.

I have requested not to postpone, as I didn’t want to spend more time on thinking about this.

She then proceeded with questions , asking me to explain the situation and reasons behind the appeal. I have explained everything that I wrote here clearly and best as I could.
She mentioned , council Did Not submit proper evidence, but asked her to check the links to see the evidence. Adjudicator also mentioned , she would t open any such links for security reasons.

Looks like she had multiple reasons to allow my appeal. I’m pleased and grateful for the advice provided here.
Writing this for awareness for people like me.
Meeting is recorded.

Case reference 2250344964
Appellant xxxxxxxxxx
Authority London Borough of Redbridge
VRM GY70GCZ
PCN Details
PCN AF08947587
Contravention date 05 Apr 2025
Contravention time 17:02:00
Contravention location Cranbrook Road
Penalty amount GBP 80.00
Contravention Parked without payment of the parking charge
Referral date -
Decision Date 21 Oct 2025
Adjudicator Herjinder Mann
Appeal decision Appeal allowed
Direction
cancel the Penalty Charge Notice.

Reasons
1. This is a personal appeal against a penalty charge notice.

2. The Appellant states that they made a payment using Pay By Phone using location 7180. They submit that the signage did not refer to payment via Ring Go.

3. The Enforcement Authority have not provided the Traffic Order only web addresses for a links of various Orders. It is for them to establish that there was a contravention and provide the valid Traffic Order. As they have failed to do so, I am allowing the appeal.

Oh wow that’s published now. Yeah That was the case. Thank you for sharing @stamfordman . Truly appreciate all responses and support provided here. This forum is great help to community. Positive or negative outcomes we learn a lot from passionate legal community .