3. Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1  (Read 678 times)

0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« on: »
Salutations to all from me.

and "When it rains...it pours!!!" springs to mind.

Have received another PCN, this time for the above-mentioned alleged contravention.  Details are:

PCN

CCTV footage

GSV


Will be submitting initial reps along the following lines:

1) using @Hippocrates argument of missing mandatory language pertaining to "...Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of...."
2) tree foliage on the nearside along with height of the signs did not give a clear and unrestricted view of the said signs;
3) no advance warning signs with the enforced times, just the following (see pic).  Is this a valid [regulatory] argument?

Can't use the "Term-time only" get-out clause anymore as most (not all!!) have been taped over.

Thoughts/opinions please before I shoot it off to Redbridge council.

Regards - NTIAEP
« Last Edit: November 27, 2025, 12:21:34 pm by NTIAEP »
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« Reply #1 on: »
I like it.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« Reply #2 on: »
As expected, Redbridge rejected my reps.....so London Tribunals hearing in the pipeline.
Logged
Re: Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1
« Reply #3 on: »
What did they say?
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. Redbridge / 53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone / Uphall Rd IG1