Nor copies attached
Perhaps i am being flippant, but their assumption that their letter is 'substantially compliant' is rather akin to saying a woman is slightly pregnant.. either she is or she isn't , and likewise so is their letter.
They also claim that tribunals have agreed with this, it would appear they have not looked at the rejections we posted
CP did they look at them?
Apart from this, is it worth putting DD reasoning on the dates being incorrect?
I am not not great of putting into words a fluent case for the Tribunal. Are there any templates that might be available
TIA




