Thanks for this. I just made an online representation under similar grounds.
This is not a legal advice or anything, if it helps others, the wording is below (I know #4 is not really ground for cancellation but it is specific to my case).
=======================================================================
I believe the PCN was unfairly issued due to the following reasons:
1. Inadequate and Insufficient Signage
There were no clear and visible advance warnings on the A4 before reaching the exit to indicate the prohibition. As a long-term user of this exit, I was unaware that recent restrictions had been put in place. Given that this exit has been unrestricted for years, the council should have ensured clear and noticeable advance warnings before the junction to allow drivers to take an alternative route safely.
2. Recent and Unexpected Changes to Restrictions
The prohibition was implemented during the Christmas period when I did not use this exit. This was my first time using it since the change, and I was unaware of the new restriction. The lack of prior warning to regular users of this route caused confusion and led to an inadvertent contravention.
3. Highway Safety Concerns
Upon exiting the A4, I was immediately presented with multiple signs at a location where it was unsafe to stop and read them properly. There are about 10 signs at that exit, speed restriction, parking restriction, 2 camera signs, 2 one way signs, lorry sign, lorry entry times and dates, road name. The complexity of signage at the junction made it difficult to process the restriction in real time, particularly while navigating a busy exit.
4. Emergency Circumstances
On the day of the alleged contravention, I was responding to an urgent situation—picking up my wife from Hammersmith station as she had fallen ill. Given the urgency, my focus was on reaching her as soon as possible, and I did not anticipate the restriction due to the reasons stated above.
5. Alternative Actions Were Unsafe
Once committed to the exit, reversing back onto the A4 was not a lawful or safe option due to Highway Code Rules 200 and 201. The council’s restriction forces drivers into a situation where they must proceed, making enforcement in such cases unfair and unreasonable.
6. Request for Consideration
In light of the above, I respectfully request that this PCN be reviewed and cancelled. The lack of advance signage, the unexpected nature of the restriction, the complexity of signage at the exit, and the emergency nature of my journey all contributed to an unavoidable situation. I would appreciate if the council could exercise discretion and consider either cancelling the charge or providing further guidance on improving signage to prevent similar incidents in the future.
