No, it's for your reps.
No, don't abandon the wrong contravention angle, it just gets introduced ...
..in any event, even if the Ts and Cs of use, which the driver subsequently understands require a P&D ticket to be obtained at a cost of £0.00, were conveyed the contravention grounds are incorrect: in short the council are demanding a penalty of up to £80 on the basis that a ticket was not purchased for the sum of £0.00. There are several adjudication decisions on councils' attempts to pursue a penalty on this basis, including the following: *****.
The authority will notice that the council against which the adjudicator ruled in this case was Redbridge. It should therefore follow that officers would consider the driver's initial representations against this framework. However, as far as I can see from your reply dated *** the authority disregarded this decision which IMO constitutes a procedural impropriety, which is my second grounds of representation.
But wait for the views of others.