Skip to content

PCN - Islington parked over expiry of paid time (05) confusion

567 Views 43 Replies

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

#31
Sorry, I was having problems inserting the images. They are showing up on post preview but not when I post. The stuff I pasted is a copy and paste job from their letter anyway. 

Pl stop transcribing and post the actual docs, you WILL miss something as well as getting a stiff wrist.





Last Edit: July 07, 2026, 01:16:47 pm by cyou251
Re: PCN - Islington parked over expiry of paid time (05) confusion
Reply #34 on:
#35
I am a little confused as to where to go from here. I received the parking payment reminder and the only appeal was to go to https://www.islington.gov.uk/parking/ and make representation? Is this correct? It feels like a repeat of the challenge I made previous.

In other comments on other posts there was a suggestion of registering with the London Tribunal, is this what I need to do? It's all very unclear.

In case I need to make representations via the Islington website I posted above I have typed up some points which I am posting below. Do I also need to provide evidence as it specifies? If so what would you recommend? In any case here are my points:

1. The signs state that parking is allowed except for ‘match days only’ however on the date of the offence there was not a ‘football match’ but rather an event. This would contradict the ‘only’ in the sign. I paid for parking up until the end of the specified time thinking paid parking ends at 1:30pm.

2. To be able to decipher that the term match also refers to events, you would need to read through the traffic/councils code that specifies a match also refers to an event. This is not a reasonable thing to research on a smartphone on the side of the road.

3. In the council’s response to my initial challenge to the PCN, they too admit that it was not a match day but an event.

4. Numerous decisions by adjudicators in similar cases have dismissed these exact same penalties. The first case was 2250451308, the second case 2250480306, the third 2250482414, then 2250512537 and finally 2250234820.

5. Adjudicators in these cases have also stated that the controlled zone signs need to ONLY indicate the date of the next event and not the following events. The current controlled zone signs do not currently do this. On top of this, the adjudicators have stated that the ‘DPZ signs are in a state of disrepair and the panels zigzag, which make it difficult to read’

6. Other councils have eliminated the ‘match days only’ wording from their signage many years ago due to confusion but Islington have persisted with this.

Re: PCN - Islington parked over expiry of paid time (05) confusion
Reply #39 on:
#40
Just on this note, does anyone know if I would be able to challenge this penalty on my own, without my husband whos name the vehicle is in

So it's a notice to owner. but it's dated 20 July

I had been away for a few weeks


OP, it's not addressed to you, so where you have been isn't the issue, it's why the addressee didn't action it before now.

As they are the party liable, I'm not happy advising you what to do about someone else's liability until it's confirmed that they are fully aware and happy for to act on their behalf.
Re: PCN - Islington parked over expiry of paid time (05) confusion
Reply #43 on:
#44
Sorry, but this is the PCN status:

PCN Status   CC Sent

So, the keeper's penalty has increased to £165 and on the face of it there's no recourse.

But to check this, what were the keeper's movements from 22 July to late August.

And to rub salt into the wound, the VRM clocked up another PCN 20 minutes later for a moving traffic contravention, but this has been paid.