Hello,
Grateful for advice please. The driver received the above contravention, a notice was left on the car despite that fact that the supposed bay markings were so faded, they are essentially non-existent. The driver feels this is completely unjustified - if a council is going to fine someone for not parking in a bay (not sure if that forms part of the HWC or needs to be written on the adjacent signage) they must surely have legible bay markings.
Please see the following 9 images, REG NUMBER redacted, but otherwise unaltered images from the Council Website showing the alleged evidence. It is telling that there are no direct photos of the car tyres outside the bay (as the bay markings do not exist).









Additionally please see here for the front and rear of the PCN left on the car:


Lastly, the following three images were taken by the driver after moving the vehicle, to show the non-existent bay markings. There is one fraction of a line visible, which does not consitute a "bay". Please note the positon of the van in the drivers' images, which is the same van as can be seen in the 1st image of the Council's alleged evidence.



The driver assumes appealing will result in a rejection although this is surely unjustified given the lack of clear bay markings. Grateful for advice on the best way to appeal to the council and any subseuqent independent/court appeals, should it be necessary.
Many thanks in advance