The sign which says
Disabled Resident Permit Holders Only is IMO not a traffic sign which can be enforced.
This is what I posted in a similar Newham thread:-
The TSRGDs (
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/4/made ) indicate:-
1. “Disabled badge holders”;
2. “Disabled badge holders only”;
3. “Disabled badge holders only at all times”;
4. “Disabled badge holder” and a permit identifier; or
5. “Disabled badge holder only” and a permit identifier
The latter two are used when there is a dedicated individual disabled space for an individual user as indicated by the word "holder" (singular not plural).
See their approval for this sort of sign here:-
https://assets.dft.gov.uk/trafficauths/case-3311.pdfThere is no provision for the words "Resident Permit Holders" in the TSRGDs and the Council would have to get DfT permission to use it----they haven't:-
https://www.dft.gov.uk/traffic-auths/?search=newham Ergo the signage is invalid and unenforceable IMO.
And that's without going into the legitimacy of general disabled bays for residents only which, to me, is discriminatory and against equality legislation.
Mike