Free Traffic Legal Advice

We need to see the video to give better advice but to start paragraph 6 of page two has no basis in law and is prejudicial to you rights. No time is stipulated for asking to view the video or have stills sent to your address. It might be you want to do this after a representation before you consider an appeal to the tribunal and the law would allow that

Ridiculous. Can we see the representation and rejection. You are right this should be taken to adjudication 

As said, wrong legislation and a prejudicial time limit on viewing the video.
They cannot enforce against legislation that does not exist.
While viewing online is fine and will often be accepted by adjudicators as an acceptable alternative to the viewing at an office of your choice, the imperative of must within 14 days is adding time limits not legislated.

Those two points alone should be enough to win at adjudication.
When you add in a particularly bad drive by video that totally fails to establish that the vehicle was stopped and it is difficult to see how you can lose.

Can we see the reps and Notice of Rejection please

Yes, I am the Authorised person.
The PCN is addressed to my company.

I cannot find my written representation, but basically I said:

"The PCN should be cancelled as the vehicle pulled over to slowly drive into a free parking space outside a row of shops. It is quite obvious the vehicle can be seen moving in the video, against a fixed street scene. It also shows the driver in the vehicle.

As this is not the first time your organisation has attempted to blatantly defraud our company of funds, an invoice will be sent directly to your offices for our time. Additionally, your head of Parking Mr ****** and the operator of the camera vehicle will be reported to the Police for investigation of the charge of Misfeasance in Public Office, and breach of the Fraud Act"

As I have had enough of tickets without any merit whatsoever, they have been sent an invoice. Its time to make a stand. A simple County court claim can follow on that one if they fail to pay. Pay dont pay, it doesnt bother me, but If everyone did the same it would collapse their extortion racket through sheer weight of paperwork.

Their retarded response appears in the link below.

https://imgur.com/a/hYQPo8E

Ye gawds !!
The NOR wording is enough to win it for you.

They do not say you were stopped but that what you were doing was likely to include a stop.
In other words, we are penalising because we think you stopped but cannot show the stop.

I would be including exactly what they say and that likely to stop does not mean stopped.
I would also be considering costs.... continuing enforcement on a whim, likely to stop, is simply having a laff.... or wholly unreasonable and frivolous to use the proper vocablary

Quote from: Pastmybest on September 08, 2023, 02:12:35 pm

That made me laugh, would you like me to draft an appeal for you

Yes please ! If you could, much appreciated.

I believe all LA's are at this point, so skint or almost bankrupt, (morally and financially), they will stop at nothing to extort as much as possible.
When their actual job is to serve the people, in a transparent and legal manner.

Dan it would be better if i deal with the whole appeal for you including the telephone hearing, this is because the second part of the appeal is technical regarding breaches of regulations if you are happy for me to do so let me know

Totally up to Dan I will write an appeal and post it here anyway for Dan to use or not as he sees fit I personally am not concerned about dans credibility in this because first off the council have to prove a contravention and their video does not do that but the tribunal can be given Dans number and if the adjudicator want to talk to him make himself available