Free Traffic Legal Advice

Thanks - what do you mean exactly?

Thanks - I am certainly thinking of appealing on those grounds. That is basically what I said in my first appeal - that it did not occur. I’ll wait a little longer before finally deciding - I think I will get the CCTV footage as well as it may be useful. It’s a nuisance having to send off for it, though.

The video won't add anything - will just show the same view as the stills although may show you parking or leaving.

Which is showing something because the camera is more than capable of capturing the applicable traffic sign, but perhaps hasn't.

As I posted and without wanting to get too energised at this stage - in particular because the OP has not posted their FoI request as asked- but something is seriously amiss here irrespective of the PCN. (which OP will be cancelled based upon your evidence. To top and tail this do you have a photo with a time/date stamp?)

There is NO evidence for at least 12 years that anything but a 10am-4pm sign has been in the first bay. So how did the OP manage to produce a photo with a 10-7 prohibition with exactly the correct background?

Because it's there is the obvious answer.

If TfL did not actually check what sign was present before responding to the FoI then IMO someone's going to be carpeted over this.

How can you be sceptical if you know that the sign you posted was in situ when you parked?

Where is your FoI request pl.

Is your photo date/time stamped?

Where's your request pl?

I'm trying to find out what you asked in your FoI.