@taffer87 you have a slam-dunk case on the transfer of liability, as there is no lease agreement and no notice of acceptance to VWFS. Without that notice of acceptance, there was no statutory power to serve an NTO on you because only the cancellation of a previous NTO gives the council a power to serve a further NTO on another person.
Have a look at the cases
here that come up when you search "
EA failed to prove cancellation of previous PCN in chain", "
EA must follow correct procedure to transfer liability", "
EA must procedure evidence to transfer liability" and "
no copy of purported lease agreement in evidence", all the legal arguments you need to make are there.
I believe most of those cases are for moving traffic so you might need to go through the parking legislation to find the equivalent provisions, but the substance is exactly the same.
Also how good are you at spot the difference? The back of the PCN in the ev
idence pack is not a perfect copy of the PCN served on you, the first difference I found was that your copy has a "PayPoint Outlet or Post Office" option but the filed copy does not, I suspect there will be more discrepancies. Have a look at rows 771 to 800 of the above spreadsheet for cases on this point.
This is one of those cases that is virtually impossible to lose if it's argued correctly.