Author Topic: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01  (Read 3673 times)

0 Members and 153 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01
« Reply #45 on: »
IMO, you won't fail at adjudication, in fact their NoR is one of the most bland responses I've read for some time, totally devoid of reasoning and on this point alone you'd probably succeed.

Do you still hold this opinion?
I think I am also going to use the sentence, ‘The NoR is totally devoid of reasoning’. But how do I support this statement?

Re: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01
« Reply #46 on: »
If the argument of contravention did not occur won't fly, then don't make it.


Why wouldn't fly? The council provided in their Evidence Pack, two photos showing entry signs for the 'CPZ MA'. But according to the zone boundary map, there should exist another entry sign for the traffic coming from Chichele Road towards the A5. But there is none.

Re: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01
« Reply #47 on: »
IMO, if you are adamant that you did not pass the required CPZ gateway signs on your route to the location and you want to present this then do so. As far as I know you cannot prove this, it's your assertion, but it's one which you made in your reps and which has been ignored in the NOR which instead goes on at length with a cut-and-paste recitation of the purpose of CPZs and how they should be signed. It appears that the authority haven't presented evidence for the adjudicator either.

There's a further procedural impropriety in the NOR in that contrary to regulations the authority did not advise you that, subject to conditions, you could apply to the adjudicator to register an appeal after the expiry of the 28-day period*. In fact the NOR reinforces this as an absolute limit by stating that once they have served a Charge Certificate 'you would have missed the opportunity to appeal'.

As I understand it, the adjudicator's power in this regard is not subject to whim of the authority's administrative processes.

And it's the authority's evidence that Athlone's NTO was cancelled on the grounds that they were a hire company and the car was subject to a hiring agreement.

And you've now reinforced the point that you did not hire the car, your insurer did.

* 6) If the enforcement authority does not accept the representations, its decision notice—

(a)must—

(i)state that a charge certificate may be served on the recipient unless within the period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of the decision notice—

(aa)the penalty charge is paid, or

(bb)the recipient appeals to an adjudicator against the penalty charge,

(ii)indicate the nature of an adjudicator’s power to award costs, and

(iii)describe the form and manner in which an appeal to an adjudicator must be made,


Appeal to an adjudicator against a decision to reject a recipient’s representations
7.—(1) A recipient may appeal to an adjudicator against an enforcement authority’s decision not to accept their representations.

(2) An appeal under this regulation must be made within—


(a)the period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of the decision notice under regulation 6(4)(b) which states that the enforcement authority does not accept the recipient’s representations, or

(b)such longer period as the adjudicator may allow.

Re: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01
« Reply #48 on: »
Dear H C Andersen,

You are brilliant!

Just to let you know that all your effort and contribution in this post bore fruit!
My appeal grounds consisted of three points: 1) the contravention did not occur (CPZ MA control zone), 2) I was not the owner (Transfer of Liability: Athlon - Auxillis - I) and 3) Procedural Impropriety (unreasonable long time taken to process the PCN).

The adjudicator commenced the hearing by immediately addressing the second ground. He did not sound keen on the other two points. He said that “the LA has failed to establish the Transfer of Liability between Athlon and Auxillius. The LA merely accepted the words of Athlon without verifying their claim with evidence. Hence the breakdown in the chain”.

He commended me (YOU) for the thorough explanation and the technical references that I (You) used to support my claim. Consequently, and without hesitation he allowed the appeal and cancelled the PCN.

On that point, I wish to express my gratitude to you for your help and your perseverance with me.

Finally, I would like to also thank “Incandescent” for his earlier informative contribution!

Like Like x 2 View List

Re: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours - Code 01
« Reply #49 on: »
Hi
Attached is a confirmation from Auxillis regarding the cancellation of the £60  admin fee charges for the PCN.
Many thanks!


[ Guests cannot view attachments ]