Author Topic: SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk  (Read 624 times)

0 Members and 90 Guests are viewing this topic.

I am sorry. i used my google timeline as the basis for that info. i don't know how or where that restriction is in realo life and to be honest in the videos all i see is a car drivinhg then a car driving again.

Please don't be cross about my lack of understanding. i am an infrequent driver and did not know about these restricted bits. That's all.

Thank you for trying to help me though.  I have a plan and am getting email help  from Hipprocrates from this point and gosh I do need it eh???

Sorry if I sound defeated. I am not, only deflated.

Again, thank you for your time HC

I am going to complain to the council and the hirer.
IF YOU RECEIVE A MOVING TRAFFIC PCN PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE MAKING A REPRESENTATION:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/moving-traffic-pcns-missing-mandatory-information-the-london-local-authorities-a/msg102639/#msg102639


How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/how-do-we-get-more-people-to-fight-their-pcns/msg41917/#msg41917

If you do not even make a challenge, you will surely join "The Mugged Club".

I am not omniscient. cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

My e mail address for councils:

J.BOND007@H.M.S.S.c/oVAUXHALLBRIDGE/LICENSEDTOEXPOSE.SCAMS.CO.UK

Last mission accomplished:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/southwark-to-r

What is the relevant clause in your hire agreement about paying PCNs, etc.?

I don't think the OP has answered this question?

There was an argument on this website that if hire companies have a term in the hire contract allowing them to pay PCNs without referral to the hirer, then such a term would be an unfair term under s63 of the https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/section/63 insofar as such a term prevents the hirer from exercising their legal right to challenge the PCN, and therefore the term is legally unenforceable by the hire company against the hirer.

So in theory the hirer would be able to recover any recharge from the hire company.

Whether this argument has been properly tested, I don't know...