Skip to content
Free Traffic Legal Advice
Login Register

Southwark code 52m - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle - LARCOM STREET JUNCTION ETHEL ST

71 Views 7 Replies

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Southwark code 52m - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle - LARCOM STREET JUNCTION ETHEL ST
on:
#1
Hi everyone,

I would appreciate some advice on a moving traffic Penalty Charge Notice I recently received from Southwark Council.

Location: Ethel Street & Larcom Street
Google Street View Link
Contravention: 52 m - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle (Motor vehicles)
Date & Time of Contravention: 15/08/2026 at 17:27
Date of Notice: 19/08/2026
PCN Number: JK20237655
Vehicle Registration (VRM): LN68VDD
PCN Google Drive

Could anyone advise if there are any known issues with the signage at this specific junction? I would also appreciate it if the experts could review the wording of the PCN to identify any technical flaws that could render it invalid.
Logged
Re: Southwark code 52m - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle - LARCOM STREET JUNCTION ETHEL
Reply #3 on:
#4
Quote from: onais on August 20, 2026, 06:24:56 pm
Thanks for your reply. I made a right turn into the road from Walworth Road into Larcom Street.
So it seems you missed the sign. Were you following any high-sided vehicles, or DD-buses just before the turn ?
Also were you following satnav ?
Logged
Re: Southwark code 52m - Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle - LARCOM STREET JUNCTION ETHEL
Reply #5 on:
#6
@onais: I will deal with this for you personally as the PCN is flawed.
Logged
@ALL MEMBERS

I HAVE A HIGH COURT CASE RE JUDICIAL REVIEW BUT WILL DO MY BEST TO ADVISE AND TAKE ON CASES IF AT ALL POSSIBLE.

If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: [1]
« previous next »