Author Topic: Redbridge, Code 73u, Parked without payment of the parking charge, Hainault Forest Country Park  (Read 378 times)

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi everyone,

I hope you are all well. I received a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) on Saturday when I took my daughters to the park, and I would really appreciate your advice.

On Saturday 6th December, I took my daughters (aged 2 and 4) to Hainault Forest Country Park in the London Borough of Redbridge. I’ve visited many times before, always paid for parking and never had any issues. However, on this occasion, while I was entering the details on RingGo, my girls ran excitedly toward the road after spotting the blue train that operates there. I immediately ran after them and did not complete the payment until later on when I remembered.

To be safe, I paid the all-day rate (8 hours), even though I only stayed for 2 hours. When I returned to my vehicle, I found a yellow PCN issued between 12:47 and 12:55pm. The PCN states contravention code 73u – “Parked without payment of the parking charge.”

Timeline of Events
  • Arrived: 12:30pm (approximately)
  • PCN issued: 12:47–12:55pm
  • Parking paid: 13:56pm
  • Left: 14:27pm

I acknowledge that I made a mistake, and I understand that Redbridge Council most likely will not accept an appeal purely on grounds of common decency. However, I am wondering whether I have a chance of success based on any of the following points:

1.    Contravention did not occur – The parking charge was paid and covered the full day, albeit the payment was not made immediately upon arrival, but there were no signs specifying “Pay upon arrival”.
  • Improper process (technicality) – The PCN records the vehicle as being observed between 12:47 and 12:55pm (8 minutes). My understanding is that there should be a grace period (possibly 10 minutes), but the CEO observed for less than that.
  • Improper process (technicality) – The parking sign states: “Failure to comply with the above will result in a PCN being issued subject to the London Borough of Redbridge (Off-Street Parking Places) Order 2013 (as amended).” I attempted to locate this order or any Traffic Management Order (TMO) for the location but was unable to find one.

I have attached the following:

Do you think I have any grounds to appeal based on the above?
Thank you very much in advance for your help and guidance.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


I can't see anything other than a polite plea for discretion based on what you say about when you arrived plus of course the receipt for parking.

Observation time is not a grace period - 10 mins statutory grace only kicks in after time has expired.

I don't think the off-street order will help but we can probably find it.

Ok, thank you, so do you think I should just pay it?

UPDATE: On 12th December I made an informal appeal online.

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to ask that you please consider cancelling PCN ********** (vehicle ******* issued at Hainault Forest Country Park on 6 December 2025.

That day I took my two young daughters (aged 2 and 4) to the park. While entering my details on the RingGo app, they suddenly ran toward the nearby road after spotting the park’s little blue train. I immediately ran after them to ensure their safety. In the panic, I forgot to complete the payment, which I only realised later. As soon as I remembered, I paid the all-day rate at 13:56pm, well before we left at around 14:30pm. We were at the park for just under two hours, but I paid for the full day (8 hours) to ensure everything was properly covered. I have attached the RingGo receipt as proof.

I have always paid for parking at this location (see previous receipts) and would never deliberately avoid doing so. On this occasion, my only concern was the safety of my children.

I am currently on Universal Credit, my wife is unwell and we are struggling financially. With Christmas approaching, this penalty would cause real hardship for our family. I would be extremely grateful if the Council could exercise discretion and cancel the PCN in light of these exceptional circumstances, particularly as no loss was caused to the Council especially as I paid more than required for the actual time we stayed.

Thank you very much for taking the time to consider my situation.

Yours faithfully,

UPDATE: I have just received this response from Redbridge Council, though the envelope's return address is in Northampton.

Rejection Letter - Page 1


Rejection Letter - Page 2


Rejection Letter - Envelope with Northampton return address


Is there anything I can do or should I pay up before the amount increases?
« Last Edit: December 31, 2025, 04:25:43 pm by anonpcn53 »

Their reply doesn't seem to be posted, can you check please. It is virtually certain you have received the usual Fob-Off letter we see so often.


God, what mean, grasping, and rapacious villains they are ! If you are prepared to wait for the Notice to Owner, you might care to read the Statutury Guidance which councils musthave regard to: -
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-enforcement-of-parking-contraventions/guidance-for-local-authorities-on-enforcing-parking-restrictions#considering-challenges-representations-and-appeals

In the above, you will find this text: -

Quote
An authority has a discretionary power to cancel a PCN at any point throughout the process. It can do this even when an undoubted contravention has occurred if the authority deems it to be appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

Under general principles of public law, authorities have a duty to act fairly and proportionately and are encouraged to exercise discretion sensibly and reasonably and with due regard to the public interest. Failure to act in accordance with the general principles of public law may lead to a claim for a decision to be judicially reviewed.

Enforcement authorities have a duty not to fetter their discretion, so should ensure that PNCs, NtOs, leaflets and any other advice they give do not mislead the public about what they may consider in the way of representations.

They should approach the exercise of discretion objectively and without regard to any financial interest in the penalty or decisions that may have been taken at an earlier stage

The downside is that so far is that none of the statutory ground for cancellation of a PCN seems to apply, although one could consider "procedural impropriety" as they seem to have failed properly to have had regard to the Statutory Guidance, because they state that because the PCN was served correctly (which it was), then it must be enforced despite any mitigation, so is totally against the statutory guidance. However it's your money because if you wait for the Notice to Owner, the discount option is lost, although it's likely they will re-offer it when rejecting your formal representations

In addition to the above, there may be a technical appeal available based on council mismanagement of the enforcement process, so wait a bit to see what may be suggested. Such appeals have nothing to do with the contravention itself.

Thank you for your reply. It really does feel as though the council’s sole focus is securing the money, with no regard for individual circumstances. They seem to issue a blanket response knowing full well that most people can’t afford to risk challenging them further, and with no real consequence for acting however they choose. It feels incredibly unfair. My family has been through very difficult times this year, and it’s disheartening to see how little compassion they’re willing to show.

I’d like to fight them further, but the risk of losing the discounted amount puts me in a tough position. What I’m unsure about is how one actually proves that the council failed to follow the statutory guidance.

Would be interested to hear what others think about this angle and whether it’s worth pursuing.