3. Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way  (Read 739 times)

0 Members and 69 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« on: »
This is the PCN for failing to give way. Thanks for everyone who helped so far on the old forum. I will be taking this all the way, so your continued help will be appreciated as it will be first-time adjudication for me.

Here's the video:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1taoUJqy_69QvL7_cfbR6I_UcJU9eio1Z/view?usp=sharing







« Last Edit: November 30, 2023, 05:02:02 pm by LondonDriver7 »
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« Reply #1 on: »

The rest of the PCN pl.
Logged
Re: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« Reply #2 on: »
sorry, fat finger, the back page of the PCN has been added.
Logged
Re: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« Reply #3 on: »
The most recent case we have on this point is Wojciech Witkowski v London Borough of Lambeth (223042845A, 11 November 2023), which followed Tim Allen v London Borough of Lambeth (2190557850, 03 February 2020) and Joseph Cartwright v London Borough of Lambeth (2210453760, 01 September 2021) (and held that the decision in Luqman Hansrot v London Borough of Lambeth (2220413682, 02 August 2022) was wrong).

I suspect I might even be able to persuade Mr Teper at this point, given how helpful the video in Wojciech Witkowski is in disproving the Luqman Hansrot rationale, but obviously the result cannot be guaranteed.

I'm happy to represent you at the tribunal if you'd like to appeal this.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« Reply #4 on: »
Thank you for the reply cp and the kind offer to defend me.

So basically my defence to the council is correct as written but they have just ignored it. I am happy to defend myself and see how this goes. In the event I get Mr Teper and he declines it, is there any comeback or that's a final decision at that point ?
Logged
Re: Lambeth, Failing to Give Way
« Reply #5 on: »
Quote from: LondonDriver7 on December 01, 2023, 04:00:46 pm
Thank you for the reply cp and the kind offer to defend me.

So basically my defence to the council is correct as written but they have just ignored it. I am happy to defend myself and see how this goes. In the event I get Mr Teper and he declines it, is there any comeback or that's a final decision at that point ?

1.  I would take up cp's offer.
2.  If you get any adjudicator, the chances of a review are totally slim.  And, if you lose that, a Judicial Review will cost mucho dinero.

Re NOR, I agree there appears to be a substantial failure to consider.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2023, 11:22:57 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. Lambeth, Failing to Give Way