Permit for what?
IMO, the council doesn't decide whether the statutory exemption to the alleged contravention applies:
(7)(a)Nothing in this section shall make it unlawful under subsection (1) of this section to park a vehicle of any of the following descriptions, that is to say:—
......
(ix)vehicles used in connection with the placing, inspecting, maintaining, adjusting, repairing, altering, renewing or removing of apparatus or accommodation therefor in, under or over a road;
Whether there was a breach of any other local or statutory Act, Order or prohibition is another matter and doesn't bear upon this contravention IMO.
OP, pl elaborate on what you were doing and the role of the vehicle in this. For example..
I am a **** and I undertake works for **** on a contracted basis. In this instance, the scope of the works was as follows:
*******
*******
The nature of the work is such that essential equipment is not portable but is set in the rear of the vehicle which therefore acts as a piece of mobile plant/workshop, that is to say the vehicle must go to the site of the works because what is being examined/repaired cannot be moved to the vehicle, ** get quite annoyed if their cables are cut.
At the time of the alleged contravention, I was examining and testing cables which, as can be seen in my photos, were trailed across the footway to the rear of my van, hence my barriers.
Exemption 7(ix) of section 14 of the GLC General Powers Act therefore applies and the PCN must be cancelled.
I leave it to the authority to decide what further action to take as regards the biased photographic evidence which omits any view of the rear of my van.
OP, pl fill in the gaps and post your own draft here.
Are you the registered keeper of the vehicle?