Author Topic: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly  (Read 18711 times)

0 Members and 102 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #15 on: »
Good morning. I have just received a response on my appeal and it was denied. I can see they do not recognize double horizontal lines (extra lines) at all and still insist I was outside the bay. Please see their response via the below link:

https://imgur.com/a/7lrUSJI
« Last Edit: July 16, 2025, 11:22:21 am by Vada_nevada »

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #16 on: »
You may wish to redact yr name & address from the NoR and repost.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #17 on: »
Please see the link below.

https://imgur.com/a/7lrUSJI

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #18 on: »
I would be inclined to go with this. They've not addressed the practicalities of the baby you raised in the circumstances of parked cars at the time.

You can also say you paid to park.

There are also the odd markings but not sure about this unless you can go back and take pics with no cars there - maybe old markings are showing.

If this were to go the tribunal they would also have to produce a correct traffic order, which often trips them up. 

See what others say.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #19 on: »
"the markings are slightly worn" 
Clearly this person has never been on-site to see the markings, which seem to have almost disappeared, if the photos are to be believed.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #20 on: »
Looking at the pics again it does look like there is some kind of line ahead of the car.

And the bay looks very narrow although this is a giant SUV - the pics show you could hardly see the sidelines anyway when parked.


Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #21 on: »
Are you the registered keeper with current DVLA details?

And for accuracy, it's an on-street parking place, you keep referring to off-street.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #22 on: »
My husband is the registered keeper. I figured each bay is numbered with faded 1/2/3/4/5 and I am not sure if the width of 175cm is correct one but definitely making it very tricky to fit in. I took some photos of other cars parked in this location showing everyone being over that width line. Horizontal lines are unclear and faded but also confusing given those number are not visible and can be taken as another border line.

Please see the link below i have taken as many photos as possible if that helps.

https://imgur.com/a/7lrUSJI

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #23 on: »
Does anyone know if they fined me for not fitting width or length? If width, then I am not parked on the line neither over it based on their photos. Because the middle bit is likely the number not the line? See attached. I can see that there is still option to appeal again. Is that an error?



[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #24 on: »
Width.  But no evidence of onside position of the car to the kerb.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #25 on: »
Length surely - car is intruding into the bay in front.

But there's more to this as set out in the challenge.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #26 on: »
So am I able to challenge it again, what points can be used? I feel the bay width is not correct as should be 2 meters. Please advise what can be done now if it is worth a battle.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #27 on: »
Can you post the rejection. I think it's worth going on with it but you'll need to wait for the NTO.

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #28 on: »
Please see the link below:

https://imgur.com/a/gKjKS7j

I am pretty sure there was an option to make a challenge a few days ago. Is it better to try now without waiting for NTO?

Re: Kingston- 24 not parked correctly
« Reply #29 on: »
Wait for NTO.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"