3. H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted  (Read 75 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted
« on: »
Hi All, have received two PCN 52M for failing to comply with LTN restrictions in Fulham. Have appealed first based on not knowing area/using satnav/unfair use of LTNs to raise revenue (first time I've ever cited Daily Mail article - which is unlikely to succeed, I think. But the second PCN includes an image that has clearly been redacted. Neither the vehicle reg or the signage is impacted but I feel it undermines the authenticity of the photograph. Does anyone else have a view/experience?





My Gallery — Postimages
postimg.cc
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted
« Reply #1 on: »
Please keep this thread for the 1st PCN, posting here the details requested in your earlier thread
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-imperial-roadfulmead-street-redacted-image-10315/msg113998/#msg113998

Is the PCN posted here the 1st or 2nd? (you say they are both on the same day).
Logged
Re: H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted
« Reply #2 on: »
I've already appealed the first PCN, this is for the second. Please allow this to stand. I just want some answers and feel like I've already uploaded all the necessary info.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. H&F PCN 52M Evidence Image Redacted