Author Topic: Havering – Code 52M “No motor vehicles except for access” – South Street RM1 – hotel access  (Read 467 times)

0 Members and 2824 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hello,

I’m seeking advice on a Havering moving traffic PCN which I believe was wrongly issued.

Council: London Borough of Havering
PCN code: 52M – Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle
Location: South Street RM1 / Eastern Road RM1, Romford

Background / what happened

On 27 September 2025 I drove into South Street RM1 solely to access premises within the restricted zone. I was dropping off at Spark by Hilton, 112–116 South Street RM1 1SS, which is located inside the “No motor vehicles – Except for access” restriction.

I drove directly to the hotel entrance, stopped briefly, and then exited the zone. I did not use the road as a through route. I was dropping my uncle there, who is late 70s and not very mobile. He'd just visited my terminally ill dad for the last time, so this is even more frustrating for me tbh.

I made formal representations to Havering explaining that the signage allows access and that I was accessing premises within the zone. I provided the hotel booking as evidence (booking was for an accessible room). Havering rejected the representations without addressing the access exemption.

I appealed to London Tribunals, and the appeal has been successfully registered with a hearing scheduled. Despite this, Havering subsequently issued a Charge Certificate saying the fee had now gone up to £240 because I hadn't acted on time, which I understand should not happen while an appeal is live. I definitely got the appeal in on time.

Current status

• Appeal registered with London Tribunals
• Case reference: 2250652740
• Hearing date scheduled
• Charge Certificate issued after appeal registration

I would appreciate guidance on:

Whether my understanding of the “except for access” exemption is correct in this situation
Whether the Charge Certificate issued while an appeal is registered is procedurally improper
Any additional arguments or defects I should raise at tribunal
I have uploaded all documents below.
Thank you very much for your help!










this is my tribunal confirmation email, i havent included the call details of course but here is a snippit of it-


LOCATION





Image imbedding doesn't seem to have worked, so here is a dropbox link to all the photos - https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/88vsfz44xxtmd13xi9u7m/ALyqjIwSBTexwyFFYMOZiOw?rlkey=dxwyho5mvrk6notcb27zbg2yy&dl=0

https://maps.app.goo.gl/pg3Tqokir8PVg29Q9
Link here, if you go forward one space it jumps to how it was in 2009 which was NO ENTRY signs with 'Buses only' underneath, but they changed it to "Except for Access" in the last few years as seen in the pictures.

One thing to add, is that Havering don't even keep the fine at £80 if you loose your appeal - bascially to appeal, its a literal gamble which I think is so so wrong! I would have paid the £80 just for ease after i lost the appeal, but I literally can't afford the £160!

Thanks so so much everyone!

Sorcha
« Last Edit: January 09, 2026, 10:18:20 pm by sorcha_a »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook



I can be your representative - email mrmustard@zoho.com
I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.

@sorcha_a I would go with the offer of @mrmustard

There are quite a few of these at present ( :o ). There is a hearing this Wednesday if anyone wants to observe @15.30 hrs.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2026, 12:55:57 pm by Hippocrates »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"