« Reply #26 on: November 14, 2024, 10:16:46 am »
I am having a bad year and only won 76% of my tribunal cases in 2024.
That was due to 10 cases being the subject of an about turn by adjudicators on what was previously a winning argument; I am usually at 80-90%
I wager some of these arguments were technical. This why we need a higher Tribunal as in Scotland. Or a "man of straw" like me. I am tempted to take several issues to the High Court. No car. No money. No problem. A hired one will suffice. Fee exemption plus a protected costs order. I am thinking of leaving this crazy lottery with a bang. Serious.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2024, 10:18:25 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply.
"Hippocrates"
ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι ε