@John U.K.Yes, you are right sorry. I am sending in my representation against the NTOs. My understanding is if this is rejected, I will get a Notice of Rejection and then I can make an appeal to an independent adjudicator (the tribunal?).
I've tried to keep the final draft as short as possible and state the facts as suggested by
@Enceladus
I am appealing the Notice to Owner (NTO) issued to me. This appeal applies to 13 of the 14 Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs - Appendix 1.1) related to this case. For the 14th PCN (ZN12536367), I wish to appeal but was not made aware of how to make a representation against it. As of now, I've received 4 NTOs, with 9 pending. I will provide context before presenting my three-part representation, which I'll explain in detail in separate sections.
Executive SummaryI've held a resident's permit since October 2023. From April 12th to July 12th, 2024, I was abroad for work. My permit expired on April 25th, and I don't recall receiving a renewal notification. Consequently, my car remained parked and stationary in the same place without a valid permit for 61 days.
During this period, 14 PCNs were issued before the council decided to remove my car on May 31st. On June 1st, my sister and a family friend recovered the vehicle on my behalf, paying £265 (£65 PCN fee, £200 removal charge).
I've received 4 NTOs and expect 9 more. The council's potential £1690 demand for late permit renewal is excessive, especially considering my five-year residency and consistent permit history.
My appeal consists of three parts:
- The council's failure to remove the vehicle earlier.
- Absence of permit renewal reminders or attempts to contact me.
- Procedural failures during vehicle impound and release.
The council's failure to remove the vehicle earlierMy car remained stationary throughout the period these PCNs were issued. Tickets were issued almost daily from 07/05/2024 to 30/05/2024 (Appendix 1.1), often just minutes after 24 hours had passed. For instance, PCNs were issued at 08:20 on 22/05, 08:28 on 24/05, and 08:10 on 25/05.
All PCNs except one (dated 29/05) were for contravention code 12(i) at the same location on Cornwall Road. This pattern shows the contraventions were essentially identical, making the number of PCNs excessive and punitive rather than corrective.
___, Head of Highways and Parking, stated in response to my complaint made to Haringey Council (Appendix 2.1): 'Normally after 3 PCNs the vehicle is flagged for removal... I can see from the PCN issued on 30th May that there were 5 PCNs attached to the vehicle and agree that the vehicle should have been removed sooner.’
A single, continuous contravention occurred as the vehicle remained stationary. No law entitles authorities to issue PCNs every 24 hours for the same offence. For continuous contraventions, authorities should use other powers, like vehicle removal. The Council's failure to remove the vehicle promptly should not result in my liability for multiple penalties. This approach is disproportionate and unfair.
The admission by ___, along with the 14 PCNs issued before removal, highlights the council's failure to follow their procedures, resulting in an unjustified number of PCNs for a single, ongoing contravention.
Absence of permit renewal reminders or attempts to contact meAs a five-year resident with a consistent permit history, I've held three consecutive permits with Haringey Council:
May 2022 (1 Year)
May 2023 (6 Months)
October 2023 (6 Months)
My prompt renewals upon receiving past communications demonstrate my reliability.
Haringey Council states: "You'll get an email 5 weeks before your permit ends asking you to renew your permit." However:
- I did not receive this reminder email and cannot locate it in my records.
- No follow-up emails, text messages, or letters were sent.
- No other attempts to contact me were made.
This lack of communication contrasts with other councils' practices, such as Hackney, which sends multiple reminders. Haringey's single email attempt is insufficient to inform residents of expiring permits, especially given my history of prompt renewals upon notification.
Procedural failures during vehicle impound and releaseMy sister and a family friend recovered the vehicle on my behalf, paying the removal PCN and release fee. The impound staff provided only the PCN receipt (Appendix 3.1) and a vehicle removal receipt (Appendix 3.2), with no information about my rights to appeal or make representations. Additionally, no documentation about how to make representations was provided. I remained unaware of these rights until I sought legal advice.
This was a clear breach of the 'Statutory guidance for local authorities in England on civil enforcement of parking contraventions'.