Author Topic: Haringey 52(M) failing to comply with a prohibition of vehicle, Gordon Rd N11 (near junction Bounds  (Read 2888 times)

0 Members and 830 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi - Its been almost 4 weeks since the ticket went off hold on the website but I haven't had anything in the post from the council. I'm assuming that because the charge has doubled that my reps got rejected but it does not actually say that on the site.

I've attached the latest status on the site. Does anyone have experience of what I need to do now ? Do I continue to wait for the status to change and/or the letter through the post ? Or should I contact them and say that I have not heard anything ? How would I even contact them ?

Don't want to miss the appeal on a technicality ! Many thanks in advance.

http://
http://
« Last Edit: September 18, 2025, 08:19:27 pm by cosmic_explorer »

Let sleeping dogs lie for the present.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Like Like x 1 View List

Hi all - Just an update on this. The PCN has been cancelled ! The reason they gave was because they did not reply in time. I actually got the letter by email after midnight on a Sat (so am guessing it was a system issued one). Am not sure if it was the reps I made above or indeed their lack of reply (or both) but something worked. I've attached the reply here for future use so it can inform others. Have left out the name of the Process investigation Team Leader for privacy in case. @Hippocrates - thank you for your reps wording and advice from previous cases which came in very useful. Happy to forward you the full letter if helps, just let me know.

Thanks again to everyone else on here who responded and for your excellent advice, much appreciated.  You all are very decent people to take so much time out of your life to help others in stress. :)


« Last Edit: October 05, 2025, 07:36:03 pm by cosmic_explorer »

Their excuse is total bo**cks, because there is no statutory limit on responding to reps under the LLA & TfL Act 2003.

But it's a win, so very well done for standing your ground!