@Pastmybest.In his decision, ***** did not deal with the important issue of the alleged procedural impropriety surrounding the conflation of date served/date delivered pertaining to the Notice to Owner. The NtO date was 10th October; but, it was not received until the 13th October. As argued verbally, whether prejudice was caused or not, if the appellant had counted from 13th October, she would have received a charge certificate.
I stress that this is not an attempt for a second bite at the cherry. Rather, this application is based upon the original adjudicator’s lack of addressing the issue in his decision.