Free Traffic Legal Advice

That looks ok to me. They are likely to reject whatever you say, but that unlocks the next stage is where an independent adjudicator will actually pay attention to what you wrote instead of fobbing you off.

If you wanted to go a little harder you might add this:

3. I am shocked by your insistance that a motorist should access a website when they see your signage, as doing so would constitute an offence under section 2 110. (1)(a) of the The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003. If you continue to assett that motorists "can check the Wembley event dates on the Wembley Stadium website" in your response, I require you to explain what exemption to the law allows this. I remind you that the Regulation also states:

(2) No person shall cause or permit any other person to drive a motor vehicle on a road while that other person is using—
(a) a hand-held mobile telephone...

If you do not accept that you are wrong about this, I reserve the rght to do exactly as you say and report that I have done so to the Police stating that you are the person who has permitted it.

Good evening,

please see below my intended response to the EN, I would be grateful for any feedback before i send off:
Dear Sir/Madam, I make representations on the following grounds: The contravention did not occur.

1. As the Authority will see from their evidence (pictures and Video), there were no signs to indicate the 29/11/2025 was an event day. The council states that there are digital warning signs on the main routes into the event zone, however none were noted on my route; furthermore ‘digital warning signs’ are not part of the statutory signage, motorists are under a duty to obey traffic signs, as listed in the TSRGD

2. The Council suggests motorists have a responsibility to check the Wembley Stadium website to check for event dates, however this is not correct. Drivers have the duty to adhere to statutory signage and obey to statutory signs, not check websites.

For completion I request for the council to supply a copy of the camera certification.

As per the Schedule 1 of the London Local Authorities Act 1996 Admissability of certain evidence 7 (6), I insist attendance at the hearing or trial of the person who signed the document.

NO! I will take a look later.

Hi H, thank you very much for this. I shall wait for the next bit before i formulate a response with the amendments. thank you very much

Dear Sir/Madam, I make representations on the following grounds: The contravention did not occur.

1. As the Authority will see from their evidence (pictures and Video), there were no signs to indicate the 29/11/2025 was an event day. The council states that there are digital warning signs on the main routes into the event zone, however none were noted on my route; furthermore ‘digital warning signs’ are not part of the statutory signage, motorists are under a duty to obey traffic signs, as listed in the TSRGD

2. The Council suggests motorists have a responsibility to check the Wembley Stadium website to check for event dates, however this is not correct. Drivers have the duty to adhere to statutory signage and obey to statutory signs, not check websites.
3. A PCN must state this:

(e)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an enforcement notice may be served by the council on the person appearing to them to be the owner of the vehicle;

However, you confuse the issue by stating this correctly and then stating you WILL send one. Also, the initial letter of rejection corroborates this latter error. So, this is akin to a procedural impropriety.

4.  The Enforcement Notice conflates service with delivery.  The two are not necessarily the same and so this is also akin to a procedural error.
5. The video shows no advance warning signage allegedly passed.

In light of the above please cancel the PCN and EN.