Free Traffic Legal Advice

This is a width restriction with a wider central section. There was another vehicle parked before the width restriction which gave the driver a reduced manoeuvring distance before the restriction. The car is 5.3m long, and just fits through the restriction. They elected not to mount the kerb or needing to reverse on the road (because of the traffic) in order to get through the gap, but to go through the central section. In the evidence video, the cars before and after both need to make sharp turns after the parked car.

I suspect that we'll need to make payment (reduced until 22 June), but I wondered if the driver might usefully make representation, perhaps on the basis of the limited manoeuvring space available?

PCN: https://imgpile.com/p/7uNJv5I
Evidence image: https://imgpile.com/m/QwCXoLe (imgpile won't upload the whole video)
Video snapshot showing space available: https://imgpile.com/p/lBESfg3
Google Street view:
Google Maps:

Any advice or help would be most gratefully received.

They say they do, but I don't want to get caught out and lose the reduced payment rate.

Which is why I'm posting here for some advice and possible assistance.

They say they do, but I don't want to get caught out and lose the reduced payment rate.

Sorry you are wrong. If you want to pay it now, then please feel free to join The Mugged Club like the other 99% actually or accept my advice vis a vis a representation.

I will  be blogging about this very soon.

Thank you, that what I needed to know. I'm not averse to challenging tickets and fines - I've successfully done several already, but only with the information to know whether it was worth fighting. What I didn't know here was whether there were grounds to do so. If it's not a viable option, I'd rather not spend the time on it.  If, however, it is viable, I'm very happy to try. I've posted here to find that out.

Thank you, that's very kind.