Author Topic: Southwark 52m Rye Lane Blenheim Grove  (Read 22 times)

0 Members and 61 Guests are viewing this topic.

Southwark 52m Rye Lane Blenheim Grove
« on: »
Hi,

I have also received a PCN on my inward journey (post is here)

In this case, I was following the SatNav, but there also were no signs stating the road ahead is not drivable!

PCN:

Image IMG 0463 hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Screenshot of Southwark council PCN page:

Image Screenshot 2026 05 25 at 15 45 56 Penalty Charge Notice details hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co


Streetview


Are there any grounds for getting this cancelled?


Please help, thank you!

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Southwark 52m Rye Lane Blenheim Grove
« Reply #1 on: »
There was an interesting case on the London Tribunals register of appeals for Rye Lane junction Blenheim Grove

Search case reference: 2220643718

Decision date: 28 Nov 2022

You can read the case here:
London Tribunals holds separate statutory registers for appeal cases heard by the Environment and Traffic Adjudicators and the Road User Charging Adjudicators. The registers can be accessed through...
London Tribunals · londontribunals.gov.uk


Perhaps read the recent southwark cases on FTLA in respect to collateral arguments ie by challenging flaws in the PCN wording, PCN portal or when the LA fail to consider a representation.

GSV shows that from entry to the road the driver is presented with a one-way directional sign, then at the midway point of the road there is a straight ahead directional arrow road marking, upon passing that the road narrows considerably, the traffic seems to be funnelled towards the restriction, and it seems quite difficult to negotiate a u-turn:
Image GSV hosted on ImgBB
ImgBB · ibb.co
, while the 619 sign seems to be poorly illuminated as per the image on PCN. I responded to your other post so check that for insights.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:05:19 pm by ryan93 »