I am thinking of the Fifth Set and would respectfully advise doing a draft re the signage as an informal challenge which, of course, they will reject. I am thinking of costs, possibly, if won. A costs application was won yesterday because the important issue was raised from the outset and intransigently rejected. (Bromley).
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/bus-lane-ticket-barking-and-dagenham/msg5163/#msg5163******
Draft:
Dear Sirs
Ref: PCN no. BZ80352064 VRM GV62 KBZ
I make this initial submission against the PCN as follows:
1. The PCN does not state the exact locus of the alleged contravention.
2. The video evidence shows no relevant warning signage allegedly passed by the vehicle concerned.
3. Unless you can provide me with strict proof that the camera has the correct VCA certificate to satisfy the criterion of admissibility of evidence at the Tribunal as provided at para. 7(2) of Schedule I of the London Local Authorities Act 1996(as amended), there was no breach.
Therefore, in view of the above, please cancel the PCN as you have not proved the alleged contravention.
Yours faithfully
Name
Address
******************
OP: please confirm who was driving. And who is the registered keeper as this is
driving me nuts!