https://imgpile.com/p/QpKAykoHi everyone, I’d really appreciate some advice on how best to challenge this PCN.
This PCN was issued for Contravention Code 52m at Rye Lane Junction / Hanover Park. At the time of the alleged contravention, I was carrying out a legitimate private hire job as a Bolt driver. I have full proof of the job, including pickup details and timestamps.
There was no alternative way to pick up the customer other than going through this junction. The job itself clearly states this, and the pickup point could not be accessed from another route.
I did see the restriction sign and initially attempted to turn around, but there was a vehicle directly behind me, also a private hire driver, who advised that access was allowed for pickups. Given the road layout and traffic situation, reversing or turning was not possible or safe.
I also contacted the customer to ask if they could walk around to an alternative pickup point. They explained that they were not well enough to do so and felt it was not safe for them to walk around the back, particularly given the area and time.
In short:
I was on a live private hire booking
I have evidence of the job
There was no reasonable alternative route
I attempted to avoid the restriction
The customer could not safely relocate
Accessing the junction was necessary to complete the booking
I would be grateful for advice on:
Whether this falls under necessity / mitigation
How best to structure the initial representations
Whether to focus on procedural grounds, discretion, or evidence-based mitigation
Thanks in advance — any guidance would be massively appreciated.
