0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.
Deadline to pay discount is not tomorrow. NOR fails to mention power of adj. to extend time. I would go with cp's advice above.My apologies.
I am sorry, but I am counting 14 days as it says in the letter "beginning with the date of this rejection" so I can pay the reduced rate. Is that not right?
I don't see any unforeseeable event in the video, the van might in front of the bus might be pulling over or taking a left turn, it hardly matters. The arguments I can see are:1) De-minimis, the van behind the bus only stops for 5 / 6 seconds, but this is really the upper-limit for a de-minimis defence and won't be accepted by most adjudicators2) Paperwork errors. The PCN makes a reference to the date of service right next to the payment periods, which is arguably ambiguous and confusing.3) The website argument explained in the cases at rows 587 to 603 here.The third point should only be raised at the tribunal stage, but given its success rate it's definitely worth running given Brent's website doesn't list any statutory grounds of appeal at all.As a starting point please post all the remaining pages of the PCN so that we can check for further issues.
