Free Traffic Legal Advice

This is a novel idea:

The PCN

I make this collateral challenge against its validity:

The PCN is missing mandatory information as provided at Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted

(v) that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable;

Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):

(iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice;

Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay the Penalty Charge or make representations before the end of a period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this notice an increased charge of £140 may be payable." adds to the lack of clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the required information was included or not, it is also arguable that it conflates the two periods by the use of the word "or" which many would view as being conjunctive.

I will be using it in the next couple of months. I can't answer the question. I know the Bikatov case. They have failed to consider it. That is a fairly strong ground.  Up to you.