Skip to content
Free Traffic Legal Advice
Login Register

TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney

1452 Views 19 Replies

0 Members and 2392 Guests are viewing this topic.

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #1 on:
#2
Challenging it is easy, there should be instructions on how to do that on the PCN... winning it on the other hand might not be so easy. We need more to go on to provide more useful help. I suggest you start by finding the exact  location on Google Street View and then posting the link here, so we can see what signage there is. Showing us the rest of the PCN would also be good, so we can check for errors.
Logged
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #3 on:
#4
Hi
I forgot to attached the google view link. Here it is:

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. · maps.app.goo.gl


I was parked on the left side. (near the hat shop).

I was parked there over an hour. I am asking if there is any ground I can base my challenge of.

Thank you all very much for your help.

Kind regards
Logged
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #5 on:
#6
Incandescent the restriction is actually 7 am to 7 pm, there is no restriction at all outside of those hours (confirmed by the white bay markings, which can only be used where stopping is permitted at all times when the red route is in operation.

@Avrumy here you go:

Dear Transport for London,

The alleged contravention did not occur. Stopping is permitted at this location, it might be that a PCN could have been issued for code 30 "Parked for longer than permitted" but of course that would be a lower level contravention.

I refer you to the tribunal decision in Spencer Weems v Transport for London (2180331206, 22 September 2018).

It follows that the alleged contravention did not occur, and the penalty demanded exceeds the amount duly set by law.

Yours faithfully,

Make representations via the TfL website and make sure to keep a screenshot of the confirmation page.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #11 on:
#12
Just wait for the notice to owner and let us know once you've got it.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #13 on:
#14
Draft reps:

Dear Transport for London,

For the reasons explained at (LINK) the PCN is invalid and must be cancelled.

Yours faithfully,

I will PM you a link to put in the representation, it will redirect to here but if you give them the link I'll PM you, we can use the click count to confirm whether they've looked at it or not (obviously do not click on that link yourself as we want the click count to remain at zero). If they don't click on it, we can then prove they've failed to consider all of the evidence. If they say in the rejection that they've considered all the evidence, we've got them for lying as well.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: TFL / Stopped where prohibited (on a red route or clearway) / Stamford hill - Hacney
Reply #14 on:
#15
TFL luvs you cp!
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »