Reply #9 on: August 08, 2024, 12:07:04 pm
#10
Dear Newham
Ref: PCN
I make the following challenge:
1. The alleged contravention did not occur since the video does not show any advanced warning signage allegedly passed.
2. The alleged incursion is de minimis.
3. I put you to strict proof that the camera used is approved. If you cannot provide this, the evidence is inadmissible.
In light of the above, please cancel the said PCN.
Reg. keeper
Address
Last Edit: August 08, 2024, 01:33:12 pm by Hippocrates
Logged
@Incandescent!
I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.
If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".
cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"
There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.
To Socrates from "Hippocrates"